Political correctness doesn't apply to fundamentally flawed claims.

Some people try to out PC each other by assigning value to "some" Ahadith by analyzing the contradictions found in the Hadith literature. I think there is a fundamental flaw in this type of thinking because the Hadith literature is fundamentally flawed on multiple levels. If one were to use these type of analysis then one is effectively giving a green light to some Ahad Ahadith. And in doing so, one will be exposing oneself to be labeled as a liar by God Himself. The only way to safely negotiate claims made in the name of the Prophet of God is to apply the criteria of accepting and rejecting claims found in the message of God he delivered. There is no political correctness in such an approach, in fact, it is not correct to do so at all.

Four minimum witnesses is the overriding rule when it comes to claims. In fact, four witness is the cornerstone of the legal system. Even when two witnesses are required for instance in the case of a financial transaction,  an already agreed upon position between minimum two parties effectively results in four witnesses to the transaction, 2+2. In fact, when a single person's testimony is to be considered or rejected, the thing to note is that the four witness criteria is simulated in the presence of witnesses. It is important to note the fact that the accused's word is preferred over the one making the claim.

Hence, there is no provision in the Quran to accept a single narrator's claim without being challenged and/or rejected outright. And then there is the "tremendous" matter of being labeled as a liar by God even in a social context let alone assigning stuff to God and His Prophet.

An actual number of agreed upon mutawatir Ahadith will easily fit on a two pager with large fonts as I always say. Out of those (less than a dozen), the verbatim Hadith number is closer to half a dozen. One of them is important to meditate on;

“Do not attribute lies to me, for anyone who attributes lies to me will be doomed to Hellfire.” (Sahih Muslim)

A few of them has to do with wearing leather socks while performing wudu if I recall correctly and raising of hands during Salat but nothing that can be used to legislate and then there is the case of the last sermon, reportedly witnessed by tens of thousands and yet there are three versions.

It is no wonder that even witnesses by themselves are not a slam dunk, as is evident from the example of the last sermon, not surprisingly God in His infinite wisdom gives us an option not to automatically accept claims just because there are witnesses;

Say, [O Muhammad], "Bring forward your witnesses who will testify that God has prohibited this." And if they testify, do not testify with them. And do not follow the desires of those who deny Our verses and those who do not believe in the Hereafter, while they equate [others] with their Lord. 6:150

A single person's testimony by itself has exactly zero value in Islam of the Quran. If it is not in the Quran please don't call it Islam.

A quick reminder, in addition to almost half of the single narrators, were kids, (yes some barely making the teen cut while others were still in their teens in 632 AD), the real stats to keep in mind are the one unsuccessfully buried under labels of Sahih and Hasan and Mashur. Over 99% of all Ahadith literature consists of third-party single narrators reporting non-verbatim claims in the name of the Prophet of God.