Deleted question on Ahadith not open to scrutiny (Yahoo Answers)

Is this a joke at our expense as Muslims?

So Bukhari's Ahadith collection was never in a single book form during his life time, is it true that the present Askalani's collection is based on the commentary of Khushaymani which in turn is based on the commentary or collection of Firabri who based his collection on some part of Bukhari's collection.

Yes I know, it seems that we should abandon our exclusivity of believe in one God, to believing in Askalani's collection and then believe that he did his job by choosing, out of 70 odd collections, Khushaymani to be the one and then we must believe that Firabri a student of Bukhari, did his job and of course we must continue to believe blindly that Bukhari did his bit and ignore another "great" Muslim, who had trashed a big chunk of Bukhari's collection and and and all this before we get into the Isnad chain, with hundreds of years between collections, commentaries and Isnads, is this a joke at our expense ?