Don't pretend to be angry, answer the questions.

Whenever the issue of the authenticity of reports ascribed to the Prophet of God Pbuh is raised, the sects keep bringing up verses of the Quran to try and prove that we are supposed to follow what the Prophet Pbuh said.

Why do they have to be reminded again and again that that is not the issue? There are no two opinions on this particular issue.

The 99.9% non-verbatim impossible to verify reports are the real issue.

And no it is not a satisfactory state of affair to claim that dozens of "scholars" have declared these reports authentic. In a Taqleedy (to accept without questioning) system it is not difficult to cite dozens of scholars photocopying each other’s work.

And no it is not enough to say it is very complicated to explain how these scholar clones go about determining the authenticity of a report.

Simplify it.

Above all back the tall claims associated with these secondary sources.

A few questions that need to be answered by the sectarians:

How did the compilers of these reports for instance, know which companions were hypocrites and which were not? Quran 9:101 is clear on the issue, not even the messenger of God knew.?

No, don't pretend to be angry, answer the question. We are not insulting the companions; we are trying to identify the hypocrites among them

How did Bukhari go through 600,000 reports without making a single mistake in the time-frame he claims he did it in?

Why are these reports not verbatim if they were transmitted by the same people who gave us the 100% verbatim Quran?

Why are so few reports credited to the Prophet's closest companions?

Why is it that more than half the companions in these reports were either preteens or teens?

And who took it upon themselves to declare Ahad Hadith (third part single narration) as authentic because surly the messenger of God would never send a single person to convey a Divine message or its explanation and go against God's injunctions?

And a dozen other impossible to answer questions.